This paper presents the methodology for the study of public expression in digital media, political subjectivity and recognition, among activists of Guanajuato, Mexico. Public expression refers to the participation of actors in the public space through digital communication practices, in order to make visible specific issues and worldviews (Flores-Márquez, 2019). Among activists, public expression is a way of struggle for recognition, and this is linked with political subjectivity. The inquiry aims to recognize the activist trajectories from their own perspective, by constructing individual/collective biographies through participatory methods. Previous studies emphasize the spark, relevance of specific events, and trajectories of activists (Alam et al, 2019; Basner et al, 2018; Fillieule & Neveu, 2019; Nolas et al, 2016; Schubring et al, 2019; Talpin, 2010; Tarragoni, 2014).
Fieldwork is organized in two phases: The first one explores the individual biographies, through semi-structured interviews with local activists, in order to draw up their personal motivations, experiences and trajectories in activism. The second phase focuses in the construction of the collective biography of local activism. This considers a workshop with activists, to integrate the individual/group trajectories and analyze data collectively. This allows to highlight key moments and challenges in their trajectories and horizons. The process articulates the data gathering with the opportunity to reflect and enhance their own process of political formation though dialogue and participation (Amoyan & Custodio, 2019; Corona, 2016; Gumucio-Dagron, 2008; Khasnabish & Haiven, 2012). The paper contributes to reflect on the methodological creativity, and challenges in participatory communication.
References
Alam, M., Nilan, P. & Leahy, T. (2019). Learning from Greenpeace: Activist Habitus in a Local Struggle. Electronic Green Journal, 1(42).
Amoyan, C.J. & Custodio, P.A. (2019). Development communication and the dialogic space. In Dutta & Zapata (ed). Communication for social change. Palgrave.
Basner, K., Christensen, J.F., French, J.E. & Schreven, S. (2018). Snaptivism: A collective biography of feminist snap as affective activism. Ephemera,18(4).
Corona, S. (2016). De los medios a los sujetos y de los sujetos al diálogo horizontal. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias de la Comunicación, 12(23), pp.122-134.
Fillieule, O. & Neveu, E. (2019). Activists' trajectories in space and time. En Fillieule & Neveu, Activists forever? Long-term impacts of political activism (pp.1-36). Cambridge University Press.
Flores-Márquez, D. (2019). Imaginar un mundo mejor: La expresión pública de los activistas en internet. ITESO.
Gumucio-Dagron, A. (2008). Vertical minds versus horizontal cultures. In Servaes, J. (ed). Communication for development and social change (pp.68-81). SAGE.
Khasnabish, A. & Haiven, M. (2012). Convoking the radical imagination: Social movement research, dialogic methodologies, and scholarly vocations. Cultural Studies <>Critical Methodologies, 12(5), 408-421.
Nolas, S.M., Varvantakis, C. & Aruldoss, V. (2016). (Im)Possible Conversations? Activism, Childhood and Everyday Life. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(1), 252-265.
Schubring, A., Mayer, J. & Thiel, A. (2019). Drawing careers: The value of a biographical mapping method in qualitative health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1-12.
Talpin, J. (2013). Former des sujets démocratiques. Idées Économiques et Sociales, 3(173), 17-24.
Tarragoni, F. (2014). De la personne au sujet politique. Participations, 2(9), 149-175.